Letters to the editor – Page 9

March 7, 2019March 7, 2019

Granger taking country into dangerous blind alley by refusing to uphold constitution

Yesterday was truly a sad day for anyone who believes in the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law. President David Granger it seems has rejected the proposals by the Leader of the Opposition Mr. Bharrat Jagdeo for the naming of a date for elections and for consequential matters following from that. Incredibly, and without any regard for the Constitution which I repeat, he is sworn to preserve and uphold, Granger informed Jagdeo that he has to “engage GECOM on the issue and thereafter another meeting will be held.”

If Granger wishes to be taken as seriously intent on observing the constitutional mandate imposed on him by the Constitution, he should at least have had that conversation with his handpicked Chairman of the Elections Commission before meeting Jagdeo so that at the very least he would have been able to make a meaningful contribution to the meeting.

March 3, 2019March 4, 2019

President Granger needs to stop the charade and call elections

It is now 70 days since the no-confidence motion was passed on December 21, 2018. That means that there are only 20 days remaining for the constitutionally prescribed period for holding elections. However, observing the pronouncements of President Granger and the Ministers of his Government and his appointees to GECOM, including the self-proclaimed non-paladin James Patterson, one has to be forgiven for believing that such elections are due at the earliest, 20 months from now. Minister Ramjattan loosely introduces the doctrine of necessity, seemingly oblivious to the more basic doctrine of constitutionality while his colleague, Attorney General Mr Basil Williams is reported in another section of the media as stating that the “Constitution is wrong.”

According to Mr Williams, it is GECOM’s duty and not that of the President to call elections. GECOM’s Chairman, on the other hand, claims that he is waiting on directions from the President to call elections and that in any case, GECOM does not have the funds to conduct those elections. Both statements demonstrate a remarkable level of ignorance or are clearly opportunistic and politically motivated, notwithstanding a statement made by one of the Attorneys-at-Law at the Court of Appeal Cases Management that the matters before that court were about the law. What the attorney did not state was that attorneys take their instructions from their clients, in this case the politicians, whose sole purpose and objective is to delay the holding of elections. This is not about the law – it is plain lawlessness.

February 27, 2019February 27, 2019

Ramjattan cited doctrine of necessity to justify failure of Administration to comply with No Confidence Motion

Last Saturday, while on a brief trip to New York, I appeared on a televised town hall style debate moderated by Mr. Sase Singh, and also featuring Vice President and Minister of Public Security Khemraj Ramjattan. The focus of the programme was the No Confidence Motion which saw the defeat of the APNU+AFC Government and its implications. Unfortunately, at several points during the programme I had to play the role of fact checker in response to Mr. Ramjattan’s cavalier disregard for the facts, his misquoting of the Constitution particularly in relation to Article 106 (7) [the holding of elections], Article 162 (8) dealing with the extremely limited powers of GECOM regarding the postponing of elections; his repetition of the visibly discredited notion that the lowest majority of 65 is 34; his misciting of the Vanuatu case despite the dismissal of that case’s relevance to Guyana; and his glib reference to the doctrine of necessity to justify the refusal and failure of the Granger Administration to comply with the No Confidence Motion.

The only accurate comment by Mr. Ramjattan on the doctrine was its association with Mr. J.O.F Haynes. In fact, I would make bold to say that Haynes’ brilliant, erudite and exhaustive analysis of the doctrine and its application to not one but two revolutionary changes in Grenada – a coup in 1979, and the removal of the 1979 revolutionary government in 1983, all of which came to an end with the American invasion on 25 October 1983.

February 15, 2019February 25, 2019

Ram & McRae and Christopher Ram & Associates have had numerous problems with Valuation Office

Two days ago, an anonymously written letter ‘Runaround from Government Valuation Office’ was published in your columns. Incredibly, the Ministry of Finance which has which always been too busy to address members of the public, responded in your columns yesterday by inviting the person to visit the Valuation Office “so that this issue can be resolved”. I wish that person luck.

By asking the anonymous writer to visit the same office which has been pushing that person around, the Ministry is hoping to avoid the serious issues which members of the public have with the Valuation Office. These issues need to be addressed by the Ministry and not by the same persons who engage in the mischief in the first place. Indeed, they require the intervention at the very high levels in the Ministry, including at the political and the executive levels. The absurdity of the intervention and invitation by the Ministry of Finance is that without knowing where the person lives, the PRO designated a time yesterday morning for the person to visit the Valuation Office.

February 9, 2019February 9, 2019

Constitution provides for eventuality where Gov’t and President fail to comply with Article 106 (7)

Today marks eighty-seven days since the PPP/C tabled its No Confidence Motion and fifty days since it was passed, the Government defeated, Cabinet including the President ceased to exist, and the imposition of a ninety days deadline for the Government to hold fresh elections, unless extended by a two-thirds vote of the National Assembly. All of this was confirmed by the Chief Justice more than one week ago.

The GECOM Administration and its Executive comprising the Chief Election Officer and his team are fully aware of all of this and it is only appropriate for them to explain to Guyanese their action or justify their inaction since then in relation to their duties and functions regarding elections as set out under Article 62 and 162. It certainly cannot be for want of money: their budgetary allocation for 2019 is a whopping $5,371 million. At least publicly, GECOM has shown a troubling inertia in discharging its constitutional mandate with the cancellation by the Chairman of two meetings which he was scheduled to have with the Private Sector Commission being a good example.